Sweet William

Surge, propera, amica mea, columba mea, formosa mea, et veni.

Saturday, July 3, 2021

Rossiter family Castles in IRELAND

Rossiter's were participated in the invasion of Ireland in 1169 by Strongbow under the auspices of King Henry the Second of England. Lambert's great grandsons, Ralf and Wakelin (John) Rossiter were among the 2000 mercenaries recruited from around the southern part of Wales. For his services, Wakelin [John] was knighted Sir John Rossiter and was granted the Baronies of Forth and Bargy. The Barony of Forth had an area of 2000 acres of arable land and contained the sea port of Wexford.

The Rossiter (Rosseter) families then proceeded to build a series of castles to protect their land. Rathmacknee was the mother castle while other strongholds were Bargy, Slevoy, Tacumshane, Ballygarvan and Newcastle, (Kilmannon). However they were deprived of their estates by Oliver Cromwell in 1650.

One of the most prominent Rosseters in Irish history would have to be Colonel Thomas Rosseter who fought against Cromwell at Wexford. By a coincidence, Colonel Sir Edward Rosseter of Lincolnshire fought alongside Cromwell at the Battle of Naseby in 1645


Bargy Castle, Tomhaggard in the Barony of Bargy, County Wexford, Ireland

Bargy Castle is a Norman fortress near the village of Tomhaggard in the Barony of Bargy, County Wexford, Ireland, some 12 kilometres (7.5 mi) south-west of Wexford town. The name Bargy derives from Ui Bhairrche, the name of a local tribe.

The building is a square keep to which two wings have been added at right angles during the fifteenth and seventeenth centuries. The keep itself is in good condition, having been renovated several times.

From the 15th century, the castle was occupied by the Rossiter family until 1667, when it was confiscated by Cromwell in response to Rossiter's part in the defence of Wexford. It was then granted to William Ivory, who sold it to the Harvey family. It came down to Beauchamp Bagenal Harvey, the commander of the Wexford insurgents in the Wexford Rebellion of 1798. After the suppression of the uprising, and Harvey's execution on Wexford bridge, the castle was again confiscated and used as a barracks until 1808, after which it was handed back to James Harvey, Bagenal's brother. He, however, lived in London and allowed the castle to deteriorate, but after his death it passed to Councillor John Harvey, who restored it. He died in 1880 and is entombed in a mausoleum in front of the hall door. The castle was afterwards let to a Mr. Leared, who re-roofed and improved it.[1] The last Harvey family member to own this castle was James Harvey, and his wife Henrietta. Their daughter, Antoinette Harvey, was born in the castle in 1945.


Rathmacknee Castle, Rathmacknee Great, Rosslare Strand, County Wexford, Ireland

Rathmacknee Castle is believed to have been built by John Rosseter (Rossiter, Rositer, Rosceter) who was made seneschal of the Liberty of Wexford c. 1415. Other accounts associate its construction with his grandson Thomas Rossiter, seneschal in 1493. The Rossiters remained Catholic after the Reformation but stayed loyal to the monarchy and continued to hold their lands. Col. Thomas Rosseter fought against Oliver Cromwell at Wexford in the Irish Confederate Wars and the castle and lands were confiscated in 1654. The castle remained occupied until the 1760s. In the 19th century it was restored by its owner, Hamilton Knox Grogan Morgan.


Slevoy Castle, Co. Wexford.

The ancient castle of Slevoy was built by the Rossiter family. John Rossiter had been part of Stongbow's force of 2000 mercenaries who invaded Ireland in 1179. For his services, Rossiter was knighted and granted the Baronies of Forth and Bargy in County Wexford, he soon set about building a series of castles to protect his land.

Thomas Rossiter, born in 1612 became a prominent member of the Wexford Confederates. He took part in the siege of Duncan Fort in 1643 and when this evidence was used against him by the Cromwell’s Commissioners, he forfeited all his Wexford estates and found himself transplanted to Connaught. Thomas Rossiter later drowned whilst on a voyage to France. His two sons John and Walter were reinstalled at Rathmacknee Castle, Co. Wexford after the 1662 Act of Settlement.

In March 1766 John Pigott obtained a perpetual lease of the lands of Slevoy from Charles Tottenham of Tottenham Green. The Pigott's built a large mansion house around the old Slevoy Castle tower. The Slevoy estate was inherited by John's first son Thomas, a vicar of St James's in Dublin. Thomas sold the estate to his brother William in 1746. William Piggot was High Sherriff in 1771. He married Hannah, daughter of Jacob Goff of Horetown, Wexford but they had no children. When William died in 1788 the estate was inherited by his grand-nephew William Pemberton and as a condition of the inheritance, William Pemberton assumed the additional name Pigott, becoming William Pemberton-Pigott. William Pemberton-Pigott was High Sherriff in 1794, a Justice of the Peace, Colonel of the Wexford Militia and also the master of the Wexford Hunt Club.


Tacumshane Castle, County Wexford, Ireland

Tacumshane (Irish: Teach Coimseáin) is a small village in the southeast of County Wexford, Ireland. It is located 15 km south of Wexford town.

About two miles away is the townsland of Churchtown which was once called Tacumshane. It is where Tacumshane castle stood until it was demolished in 1984 by a local farmer. The Fence is the townsland located in the village of Tacumshane today.

WEXFORD PEOPLE IMPLICATED IN THE 1641 REBELLION

 

A LIST OF WEXFORD PEOPLE IMPLICATED IN THE 1641 REBELLION.

FROM THE WEXFORD PEOPLE NEWSPAPER OF THE 8TH AND 15TH JUNE 1912, BY PHILIP HORE

(1841-1931) (County Library Wexford.)

 

TOWN OF WEXFORD INDICTED UPON EVIDENCE.

RAWCETER, William, Tomhaggard, Gent.

SYNNOTT, Pierce, Tomhaggard, Gent.

SYNNOTT, Henry, Tomhaggard, Yeoman.

RAWCETER, Robert, of the Bridge of Bargie, Gent.

RAWCETER, Walter, Bridgwell, (Brideswell, Carnew, Scar), Gent.

RAWCETER, Alexander, Slevey, (Near Taghmon). Gent.

RAWCETER, Philip, of Ballyhogan, Gent.

RAWCETER, Thomas, Bracestown, Clerk.

ROSSETER, Phil, of Artroman, Gent.


Indicted upon the evidence and oath of John Allen, one of the Grand Jury.

ROCCETER, Thomas, Rathmacknee, Gent.

ROSSITER, William, Chappell.

ROSSITER, Patrick, Garrecleary, Gent.

ROSSETER, Philip, of Artroman, Gent.

NEWCELLS [MANORIAL ESTATE: NEWSELLS MANOR, BARKWAY, ROYSTON, HERTFORDSHIRE] MANOR

 

NEWCELLS [MANORIAL ESTATE: NEWSELLS MANOR, BARKWAY, ROYSTON, HERTFORDSHIRE] MANOR ( Newcels, Neusela or MANORS Nieweseles, xi-xii cent.'^ ; Newesel or Neweselcs, xiii cent.) lies to the north of the village on the main road. It was held before the Conquest by a thegn of King Edward's named Aldred and by two sokemen, one of whom was Aldred's man and the other Earl Algar's man. In 1086 Eudo Dapifer held it in demesne.' Newsells evidently reverted to the Crown after his death in 1120 and was granted by Henry I to Eustace Count of Boulogne.'^ The overlordship remained in the honour of Boulogne,^* the service due being that of three halves of a knight's fee.'^

Members of the Merk family were the immediate tenants of the manor in the 12th century.

A Eustace de Merk was witness to the charter of Count Eustace confirming Barkway Church to Colchester Abbey,'' and as others of the same family were elsewhere tenants of the Counts of Boulogne it appears possible that Eustace de Merk was already tenant of Newcells [Manorial Estate: Newsells Manor, Barkway, Royston, Hertfordshire] under the count. A Sir Eustace de Merk, kt., who was living in the reign of Richard I [Richard I B:8 September 1157 – D:6 April 1199, Reigned: 1189-1199],'' was styled 'lord of Newsells ' and founded a chapel at Royston within this lordship.^" He is probably identical with the ' Eustace de Oye [d'Eu?] , son of Henry de Merk,' living in April 1190." Sir Eustace de Merk, kt., was also styled 'de Rochester ' ^ and was succeeded as tenant (apparently within his own lifetime) by his nephew Ralph de Rochester.^' This Ralph had been preceded by a ' Baldwin de Rochester,' ** presumably the Baldwin de Rochester who witnessed a charter of Henry father of Eustace de Oye" and perhaps a son of the same Henry. In this case Ralph would be son of Baldwin de Rochester. Newsells was the ' caput ' of the barony which Ralph de Rochester held of the honour of Boulogne.^^ Ralph's son and heir William de Rochester died shortly before 24 October 1249 and was succeeded by his brother Peter de Rochester,^'[aka Peter de Rossa] parson [referenced more correctly in other places as Rector or Clerk] of Rivenhall [Ruenhala ], co. Essex.^' Shortly before his death Peter took the habit of a Knight Templar.*' On the Saturday before Ascension Day, 1 25 5, as he

Baldwin MeRouec' [Rochester] gave lands in Newsells to Coggeshall Abbey in or before the time of Henry II [1154-1189](Cal. Pat, 1388-92, p. 79).

In 1275 the jurors of Edwinstree Hundred returned that the whole barony formerly held by Ralph de Rochester had been alienated since his time, that the 'caput' (Newcells [Manorial Estate: Newsells Manor, Barkway, Royston, Hertfordshire] ) was in the hands of Burnell, and that the heirs of the barony had nothing whereof they could answer to the king. In January 1279-80 Robert de Weston and his wife Hawise, who was niece of Peter de Rochester, released to the bishop all their right and that of Sir Robert Scales in Newsells Manor. In 1292 Burnell conveyed his interest to Robert Lord Scales and Isabel his wife. Isabel survived her husband and held the manor for life. About 1315 Robert son and heir of Robert and Isabel reserved Newsells in making settlement of other estates on his wife Egelina. His son Robert third Lord Scales granted a life interest in the manor to Sir Robert Thorp, kt. Upon the death of the latter, Newsells reverted to Roger Lord Scales, son of the third baron.

 

Peter de Rossa, parson [actually the Rector or Clerk] of Rivenhall [aka Ruenhala, Rewenhale] and lord of the manor, who assumed the dress of the Templars a little before his death in 1255, (fn. 2) granted to them over a hundred acres of land in Rivenhall [aka Ruenhala, Rewenhale], and in return they maintained a chaplain to pray for his soul in their free chapel at Witham. They also maintained three chaplains to pray for the souls of other benefactors in their chapel at Cressing; the first celebrating on three days of the week for John de Staundone and on four days for the founders, the counts of Boulogne, the second for Peter de Toppesfeld, and the third for Peter the clerk.

 

Writ (missing). Inq. Wednesday after St. Andrew, 40 Hen. III. [05 De 1256] He died on Ascension day [4 April 1255], 39 Hen. III.[viz: 1255]

The said Peter 3 years before his death demised to the Master of the Knights of the Temple in England the manor of Rewenhale (co. Essex) for six years for 22l. yearly, whereof the said Master gave him 66l. in hand for 3 years. On Saturday before the Ascension, 39 Hen. III. came Brother William del Estre, preceptor of Kersing and Wyham, and other brethren by the will of the Master and returned the said manor to the said Peter, who gave them about 100a. land in the said manor in frank almoign; and the same day he granted by charter to Robert de Scales (his nephew) the manor of Rewenhale, and to Alice wife of the said Robert the manor of Newesel (co. Hertford); and on the Sunday following took their homage after making them swear to find a chaplain for ever to celebrate for his soul, and that if he should recover the said Robert would give him his manor of Hoo in co. Norfolk for life, and the said Alice would give him the manor of Hecelingfeld in county Cambridge for life; and he commanded his servants, who on Monday following put the said Robert in seisin of Rewenhal manor, and on Tuesday the said Alice of Newesel manor; and so she remained until Friday in Whitsun week when the escheators ejected her. The said Peter was of good memory always until his death, and a little before his death assumed the dress of the Templars.

 

 Rivenhall [Ruenhala ], written in ancient records as Ravenhall or Ruenhala once belonged to Editha, the Queen of Edward the Confessor, and to Harold. At the time of Domesday [1086-89] it was held by four lords, three so often mentioned in this series, Eustace, Earl of Boulogne., Robert Gernon and Suene of Essex         ., and another bearing the unusual name of Roger God save our ladies. There were five manors in the parish, the capital manor came by marriage to Robert de Scalaris or Scales.

de Scales & Alice de Rochester (or de Roffa/Rossa) & Newsells, Hertfordshire and Rivenhall [Ruenhala ] Manor, Cressing, Witham, Norfolk

 

The ancestors of the Baron Scales came into possession of the manors of Newsells, Hertfordshire and Rivenhall [Ruenhala ] Manor, Cressing, Witham, Norfolk in 1255 by the marriage of Sir Robert de Scales to Alice de Rochester (or de Roffa/Rossa), whose family had held the manors since 1210. Robert died in 1256.

Peter de Scales was Robert's[i] eldest son who inherited his father's lands but died shortly afterwards in 1258.

Robert [ii] de Scales is Peter's younger brother who inherited their father's lands upons Peter's death in 1258. Robert was involved in several expeditions to France and had summons to Parliament. He was listed at Dover Castle from 1261-2, as was a Sir Radulfus de Escales [de Scales].[1] Upon Robert's death in 1266 he was succeeded by his son Robert, who he had by his wife Muriel, and who was to become the first of the Baron Scales. Left a widow called Clemencia.

The Scales family's main residences were Middleton in Norfolk, Newsells in Hertfordshire and Rivenhall [aka Ruenhala, Rewenhale] [aka Rewenhale] in Cressing, Witham, Norfolk or Essex? but also held other lands including Ouresby and Torneton in Lincolnshire.

 

Also Alice de Roucestre [daughter of Ralph de Roucestre & wife of Robert de Scales] held manor of Hecelingfeld [Haslingfield in county of Cambridge – there in Heclingfield [ Haslingfield], Cambridgeshire] is a connection with John le Rus [pre-1279]- the large stone house of John le Rus outside Trumpington gate, where the Fitzwilliam Museum now stands, no trace survives [ref: Stokes, Outside Trumpington Gates (C.A.S. Publ. 1908), 40.].

Ref association with Rewenhal also: Calendar of Patent Rolls 1268: MEMBRANE 17d. : Grant by Nicholas de Audele son of Henry de Audele to Robert Burnel of an acre of land in Rewenhal which lies in the field called 'Peycecroft' with the advowson of the said town, which he had of the gift of the prior of Cruceroyes, who had it of the gift of William de Roffa; to hold to him, his heirs and assigns, doing to the said prior the service due and accustomed, as contained in the charter of feoffment which the said Nicholas has from the prior Robert; with warranty of the premises against all persons for ever; Witnesses, Sirs Hugh son of Otes, William Charles, Robert de Scaccario, Henry de Engayne, William de Wokendon, knights, John de Kirkeby, clerk, Master Ralph de Frenigham, William de Middilton, Master Hugh de Tornham and others.

 

Under the bio of Alice’s uncle: Parson Lord Piers Peter de Merck de Roucestre de Rovecestria de Rovencestria of Rewenhale aka: Rivenhall:

Peter was also rector of Rivenhall.

Citation: The Complete Peerage, by Cokayne, Vol. XI, p. 499 - Records Piers father as WILLIAM DE ROUCESTRE [no dates are recorded]

The said Peter 3 years before his death demised to the Master of the Knights of the Temple in England the manor of Rewenhale (co. Essex) for six years for 22 pounds yearly, whereof the said Master gave him 66 pounds in hand for 3 years.

On Saturday before the Ascension [40th day of Easter, Ascension in 1255 was celebrated 4 April], 39 Hen. III [8 May 1255] came Brother William d'Estre, preceptor of Kersing and Wyham, and other brethren by the will of the Master and returned the said [Rewenhale] manor to the said Peter de Roucestre, who gave them about 100a. land in the said manor in frank almoign; and the same day he granted by charter to Robert de Scales (his nephew-in-law, since Robert was married to Alice de Roucestre?) the manor of Rewenhale [Essex, aka: Rivenhall], and to his sister, Avice, the manor of Newesel (county of Hertford, Wylton co. Norfolk); and on the Sunday following [15th May] Peter took their homage after making them swear to find a chaplain forever to celebrate for his soul, and that if he should recover the said Robert de Scales would give Peter de Roucestre his [Robert’s] manor of Hoo [Manor of Hoo, ST. WARBURGH]  [is this a connection to Alice Hawise de Hoo? Is Alice de Hoo also Alice de Roucestre?] in county of Norfolk for life, and the said Alice would give him the manor of Hecelingfeld [Haslingfield] in county of Cambridge for life; and he commanded his servants, who on Monday [17 May] following put the said Robert in seisin of Rewenhal Manor, and on Tuesday [18 May 1255] the said Alice of Newsell manor; and so she remained until Friday [27 May 1255] in Whitsun week when the escheators ejected her. The said Peter was of good memory always until his death, and a little before his death assumed the dress of the Knight Templars.

 

Archives ref: https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/C9745172 -: Peter De Rossa, Parson of Rewenhale. Essex: Rivenhall manor, Cressing, Witham. Norfolk: Hockwold(?). Cambridgeshire: Haslingfield. Hertfordshire: Newsells.

History of the Manor of Hoo:

BEFORE the conquest, the Manor of Hoo, ST. WARBURGH, with the court of the hundred, was in the possession of Godwin Earl of Kent, from whom it descended to king Harold, and after the conquest was given by the Conqueror to his half-brother Odo, bishop of Baieux, under the general title of whose lands it is thus entered in the general survey of Domesday.

 

The bishop of Baieux himself holds Hou in demesne. It was taxed at 50 sulings, and now at 33. The arable land is 50 carucates. In demesne there are 4 and 100 villeins, wanting three, with 61 cottagers, having 43 carucates. There are 6 churches, and 12 servants, and 32 acres of meadow. Wood for the pannage of 30 hogs. The whole manor, in the time of king Edward the Confessor, was worth 60 pounds, when the bishop received it the like, and now as much, and yet he who holds it pays 100 and 13 pounds. To this manor there belonged nine houses in the city of Rochester, and they paid six shillings, now they are taken away. This manor earl Godwin held. Of this manor Richard de Tonebridge held half a suling, and wood for the pannage of 20 hogs. In the time of king Edward and afterwards it was, and now is worth 40 shillings. Adam, son of Hubert, holds of the same manor one suling, and one yoke of the bishop, and one of his tenants has there in demesne half a carucate, and four villeins with half a carucate and one cottager. It is and was worth 30 shillings. Anschitil de Ros held of this same manor of Hoo for three sulings, and he has there in demesne one carucate and five villeins, with 12 cottagers, having one carucate and a half. There are five servants, and one mill of ten shillings, and 12 acres of meadow, and two fisheries of five shillings. In the time of king Edward, and afterwards, it was worth six pounds, now six pounds and five shillings.

 

On the disgrace of the Bishop Odo of Baieux [Bayeux], about four years afterwards, his estates were confiscated to the crown, and among them this of Hoo.

King Richard I. exchanged the manor and hundred with Hugh Bardolf, for the honour of Bampton, in Devonshire, which had been forfeited to the crown by Fulk Paganel, or Painel, as he was usually called, to whom it had been given by king Henry II. (fn. 2) He was a younger son of William Bardolf, of Stoke Bardolf, and bore for his arms, Azure, three cinquefoils pierced or, as they remain on the roof of the cloisters of Christ church, Canterbury. He died without issue, (fn. 3) on which this estate of Hoo became vested in the crown, whence it was granted, anno 17 king John, to Hubert de Burgh, (fn. 4) then chief justice of England, and afterwards earl of Kent, on whose disgrace it seems to have become vested in Henry Grey and Hugh Poinz, in right of their wives, two of the five nieces and co. heirs of Robert Bardolph above mentioned, in separate moieties.

 

Henry Grey left a son, Sir Richard Grey, whose principal seat was at Codnor, in Derbyshire, whose descendants were the barons Grey of Codnor. One of these, John lord Grey, of Codnor, paid respective aid for it in the 20th year of king Edward III. as half a fee, which Henry de Grey before held in the parish of Wereburghe in Hoo of the king. He lived to a good old age, and dying about the 15th year of king Richard II. was succeeded by Richard, his grandson, (son of Henry, who died in his life time) who in the reign of king Henry IV. purchased the other moiety of this manor, and so became entitled to the whole fee of it.

 

But to return to this other moiety, which came into the possession of Hugh Poinz. His great grandson, Nicholas Poinz, died possessed of it in the 1st year of king Edward I. holding it in capite, by the service of half a knight's fee. (fn. 5) He left Hugh Poinz, his son and heir, who had summons among the barons of this realm, in the 23d year of king Edward I. as had Nicholas, his son, in the next reign of king Edward II. whose descendant, Nicholas lord Poinz, having married Alianore, the daughter of Sir John Erleigh, died about the middle of king Edward III.'s reign, leaving two daughters his coheirs, Amicia, wife of John Barry, and Margaret, wife of John Newborough. (fn. 6) They joined in the sale of this moiety to Judd, from which name it passed in the reign of king Henry IV. by sale, to Richard lord Grey, of Codnor, as before mentioned, who then became possessed of the entire fee of the manor of Hoo.

 

¶Richard lord Grey was much in favour with king Henry IV. who conferred many great offices on him, and employed him much, as well in war as in civil negociations. He died in the 5th year of Henry V. it then descended down to Henry lord Grey, who died possessed of it in the 11th year of king Henry VII. without lawful issue, and was buried at Aylesford, (fn. 7) under which parish a further account of this family may be seen. Upon which, although the manor and castle of Codnor came to Elizabeth, his aunt and heir, wife of Sir John Zouche, a younger son of William lord Zouch, of Haringworth, who bore for their arms, Gules, ten bezantes; which arms, with a canton, remain on the roof of the cloisters at Canterbury; yet this manor of Hoo continued in the possession of the lady Catherine Grey (afterwards remarried to Sir William de la Pole) for the term of her life, and she died possessed of it, as appears by the Escheat Rolls, anno 1521; after which it devolved to Sir John Zouche above mentioned, who likewise died possessed of it in 1529. He was succeeded in it by Thomas Cornewall, who was possessed of it at his death, in the 30th year of that reign, as appears by the inquisition then taken. Sir Thomas Wyatt, of Allington-castle, was the next proprietor of this manor; and he, in the 34th year of king Henry VIII. conveyed the hundred and lordship of Hoo, and the manor of Little Hoo, late belonging to Boxley abbey, (fn. 8) among other premises, to that king.

 

 

They continued in the crown till king Edward VI. in his 5th year, granted to Sir George Brooke, lord Cobham, &c. the hundred of Hoo, and the manors of Great and Little Hoo, to hold in capite by knights service; but his unfortunate grandson, Henry lord Cobham, being convicted of high treason in the 1st year of king James I. though he had pardon of his life, yet he forfeited all his estates to the crown, and among them these at Hoo, all which were confirmed to the crown by an act passed in the 3d year of that reign. Soon after which these manors were granted to Sir Robert Cecil, earl of Salisbury (son of William lord Burleigh) who was afterwards lord treasurer of England, &c. and had married Elizabeth, sister of Henry lord Cobham above mentioned. He died possessed of them in 1612, and was succeeded in them by his only son and heir, William earl of Salisbury, who, in the 4th year of king Charles I. alienated them to Sir Edward Hales, bart. who possessed them at his death, in 1654; whose grandson, Sir Edward Hales, bart. became his heir, and entitled as such to these manors; but he possessed only the court baron of them; for the view of frank pledge belonging to the hundred, appears by the court rolls to have continued, from the lord Cobham's death, in the crown, and to have been in possession of the keepers of the liberties of England, as they were styled, from the death of king Charles I. in 1648, to the Restoration; three years after which, in 1663, he seems to have had, by the style of them, the full possession of both. Having risqued his fortune in the service of king Charles I. and contracted debts to a large amount, he was obliged to abandon his country, to which he never returned; and this estate being vested by him in Sir John Tufton, bart. and Edward Hales, esq. of Boughton Malherb, as trustees, was conveyed by them, by the name of the manor and hundred of Hoo, to Edward Villiers, esq. the 4th son of Sir Edward, second son of George Villiers, of Brokesby, in Leicestershire, by his first wife, Audrey, daughter and heir of William Sanders, esq. (fn. 9) upon which Edward his eldest son and heir, succeeded him in the manor and hundred of Hoo, and being much in favour with king William, was, in the 3d year of his reign, created viscount Villiers of Dartford, and baron of Hoo. He was afterwards, in 1697, created earl of Jersey, and died in 1711, leaving by Barbara his wife, daughter of Wm. Chiffinch, esq. two sons; of whom William, the eldest, succeeded his father in titles and this estate; whose descendant, George Bussy Villiers, earl of Jersey, viscount Villiers of Dartford. and baron of Hoo, is the present possessor of this manor and hundred. (fn. 10)

 

The manor of Great Hoo extends over part of the parish of West Pechham, in this county.

 

¶At the court of this manor, the following constables and borsholders are appointed—one constable for the Upper half hundred, and another for the Lower half hundred of Hoo; and borsholders for the boroughs of Hardlefield, Boxley, Deangate, Dalham, Fincent, Church-street, and Oxenheath. The court is held yearly on Whit Monday.

 

 

The Scales barony was created in 1299 by writ for Robert de Scales.

The last known holders were Elizabeth de Scales and her husband Anthony Woodville, 2nd Earl Rivers. After Elisabeth's death in 1473, Anthony was summoned in her right. Anthony was beheaded by Richard III at Pontefract on 24 Jun 1483 and the peerage fell into abeyance. However, after the death of Anthony, his younger brother Edward Woodville, a supporter of Henry Tudor, styled himself Lord Scales, having been bequeathed Elizabeth's land by his brother.

Several people have subsequently tried to claim the title but none have been successful. The most recent was made by Sir Charles Robert Tempest who claimed to be a co-heir in 1857.

In the 22d of King Edward Robert de Scales had summons to be at Portsmouth, on September 1st to attend the King into Gascoign; and in the 25th of that King it appears that he held 10 knights fees, viz. two and an half in Berkway and Newcells [Manorial Estate: Newsells Manor, Barkway, Royston, Hertfordshire] in Hertfordshire, half a fee in Laufare in Essex, half a fee in Eneswell in Suffolk, one fee and an half in Rewenhale in Essex, three fees and an half in Middleton, Islington, How, and Rainham in Norfolk, and one in Wetherden in Suffolk, held in capite, and half a fee in Haselingfeld in Cambridgeshire

 

Barons Scales (1299)

Robert de Scales,            1st Baron Scales (d. 1304)

Robert de Scales,            2nd Baron Scales (d. 1324)

Robert de Scales,            3rd Baron Scales (d. 1369)

Roger de Scales,              4th Baron Scales (d. 1386)

Robert de Scales,            5th Baron Scales (d. 1402)

Robert de Scales,            6th Baron Scales (d. 1418)

Thomas de Scales,           7th Baron Scales (d. 1460)

Elizabeth de Scales Woodville, Baroness Scales (d. 2 September 1473) - Elizabeth de Scales married Anthony Woodville the brother of Elizabeth Woodville and brother-in-law to her husband King Edward IV.


Rose Manor in South Creake [north west] West Norfolk, Norfolk, England.

 Rose Manor in South Creake [north west] West Norfolk, Norfolk, England. 

With the advownson of St.Andrew's belonged to Brode, in the Confessor's time, and to William Earl Warren in the Conqueror's, of whom Simon held it, the whole town being then above two miles long, and one broad, paid 11d. Geld. In 1194, Wakelin de Rosey gave 20s to King Richard I to have seizin of 12s 7d rent, of the service of Hervy Gore, in such manner as Baldwin de Rosey had, when he began his journey to Jerusalem, where he died., this Baldwin was lord here, and contemporary, if not brother, to Roger de Rossei, or de Rosseto, lord of Rose's Manor in South-Creke. In 1218 another Baldwin de Rosseto held it of the Earl of Warren at one fee.

The above [later in the 13th century known as Carbonel’s Manor, after William Carbonel] is recorded as being owned in tenent by a Wakelin de Rosey [Rosei] in 1194. Wakelin gave 20s to King Richard I to have seizin of 12s. 7a.Rent of the service of Hervy Gorge, in such manner as Baldwin de Rosey had, when he began his journey to Jerusalem, where he died: This Baldwin was Lord here, comtemporary, if not the brother, to Roger de Rossei, or de Rossetto, Lord of Rose’s Manor in South-Creke. In 1218, another Baldwin de Rosetto held it of the Earl Warren at one fee, in 1234, Robert Carbonel was Lord; from 1310-1340, Henry Carbonel and his wife Catherine had it, who held it after her husband’s death to her own, which was before 1399, for then Maud their daughter presented , and it soon divided, and one part with the Advowson, came to the Holdiches, who presented until 1571, and afterwards sold it to Sir Ralph Chaumberleyn, Knt. receiving two or three turns to the family; the other part went to William de Narburgh, whose daughter Ela, married Thomas Shudlam, and had a son by him of his father’s name [William de Narburgh] but he did not inherit, the manor being given by his mother to Henry, her second husband, and his heirs, and their son William Spelman inherited . In 1488, Henry Spelman died seized, and left it to Edmund Paston Esq, to perform his Will, at such which time ‘twas held of the Earl Warren, at the 4th part of a Fee, in 1606, Francis Spelman, Esq was Lord of Carbonel’s in Rockland, in which family it hath continued to this time; it being now owned by Mrs Elizabeth Spelman of London. The Lete belongs to the Hundred, the Fine is at the Lord’s Will, and the Eldest Son is Heir.


Could be related or recorded as: Baldvinus Vicecomes

William de Roucestria alias de Roucestre; from Suffolk – tenant of: Eriswell Manor ; Norfolk: Barton Bendish manor; Hertfordshire: Newsells manor, Weston town


The Thane Godwin referred to above may be:

Godwin of Wessex (Old English: Godƿin; died 15 April 1053) became one of the most powerful earls in England under the Danish king Cnut the Great (King of England from 1016 to 1035) and his successors. Cnut made Godwin the first Earl of Wessex (c.  1020). Godwin was the father of King Harold Godwinson (r. January – October 1066) and of Edith of Wessex, who married in 1045 King Edward the Confessor (r. 1042–1066).


Rossiters in Ireland

 

Rossiters in Ireland:

 

Various penal laws against the native Irish were passed in the parliaments of the Pale, particularly the Statute of Kilkenny in the year 1367, which prohibited, under penalty of high treason, any intermarriage, fosterage, or similar intercourse between the families of English descent and the native Irish; and enacted that any person of English race speaking the Irish language, or adopting the Irish name, dress, customs, or manners, ghojild forfeit all his goods, lands, and tenements.

On the Memoranda Roll of the Exchequer of the twenty- fifth and twenty-sixth years of the reign of Edward III. is the following ordinance : — " It is ordained that all those who have lands in the Marches and are resident in the land of peace, shall make their residence in their lands in the Marches, or shall put other sufficient persons in their place, in maintenance and aid of the Marches ; atid whosoever do not do so, their lands, shall be taken by the king's ministers, and expended on the March, for the safeguard thereof, according to the quantity of the land." On the 25th August, 1464, the king, by letters patent, granted to the Earl of Desmond an annuity chargeable on the principal seignories belonging to the Crown within the Pale, and the grant was confirmed by parliament.

(a) In the year 1364, the King's Bench and its records were removed to Dublin, and it appears by the Close Roll 1° Richard II., 1377, that the officers of the Exchequer, petitioned the Duke of Clarence, in the Parliament of Kilkenny, that the Exchequer should be removed from Carlow, where it was in danger from Irish enemies and rebels, to Dublin. It was asserted that it was a place unfit 'for the custody of the Exchequer, and that the allowances to the Judges (») Rot. Mem. 13° and 14° Eliz. U) Plea Roll. 37° Edward III.

 

The English territory gradually decreased in extent: " So wonderful had those Irish lords encroached into the Pale, that afterwards, when the king (Henry VHI.) came to the crown, taking in hand the general reformation of that country, it was found that the English Pale was restrained into four counties only, viz., Dublin, Kildare, Meath, and Louth, and those also not to be free from the Irish invasions; and so weakened withal, and corrupted, that scant four persons in any parish wore English habits, and coine and livery as current there as in the Irish countries, which was brought into the Pale by Sir James of Desmond, in the time of his government." And in the State Papers, part iii., vol. ii., p. 22, it is stated, that the inhabitants of the four shires " hath been so spoiled, op- pressed, and robbed, as they be not of ability to give to your grace any notable thing;" and "to the shires above the Barrow, viz., Kilkenny, Tipperary, Waterford, and Wexford, the king's judges and officers cannot resort to ministry justice."  The extent of territory under the influence of English domination materially varied at different times; and, in consequence, the extent of country represented in the Irish parliaments, holden by the English viceroys, was not always the same. I may venture to presume, that representation in Irish parliaments was at all times co-extensive, not merely with the Pale, but with whatever portion of the Irish territory acknowledged a subjection to English dominion, and acquiesced in its legislation. This, however, has been denied, and Sir John Da vies is tempted to assert, that the Parliament of 1613 was the first general representation of the people, which was not " confined to the Pale." The reasons which induced Sir John Davies to rush at tbi-; condnsion was his anxiety to flatter the vanity of James I., a prince proud and vain of his government in Ireland. It afforded him the greatest degree of satisfaction to be told that he was the founder of a constitution in this country ; but as a &ct, the positive limits of the Pale were never clearly defined. [According as the English power extended so did the Pale ; and it was considered to comprise at some periods the counties of Antrim, Down, part of Armagh, Louth, Meath, West- m6a,th, Dublin, Kildare,King's and Queen's Counties, Carlow, Killienny, Tipperary, Waterford, Wexford, and part of Wick- low; but in general the name of the Pale was confined to the counties of Dublin, Louth, Meath, and Kildare.

 

It appears that the Irish who dwelt within the Pale, and   acknowledged the English authority, were considered as subjects, and had to a certain extent the protection of English laws; but all the Irish outside the Pale were styled Irish enemies, not being recognised as subjects; while the Anglo-Irish, or Irish of English descent, who resisted the Government, were termed English rebels, being accounted as subjects.  The native Irish, according to Sir John Davies, being reputed as aliens, or rather enemies, it was adjudged no felony to kill a mere Irishman in time of peace ; and it appears that if an Englishman killed one of the mere Irish, he was only fined a mark.  He states in a letter to Earl of Salisbury, in 1610, that — " When the English Pale was first planted, all the natives were cleanly expelled, so as not one Irish family had so much as an acre of freehold in all the five counties of the Pale,.".  The Pale, which was in its commencement very indistinctly if at all, defined, became in the fifteenth century  better known as the English, part of the island, and more   accurately marked, until at length an Act of Parliament was   passed (10° Henry VII., c. 34), for making a ditch to enclose   the four shires to which the English dominion was at this   time nearly confined. Henry VII., however, introduced a better system of administration, but the English power did   not fully recover its stability til the reign of James I. The   greater part of the Irish chieftains acknowledged no superior   but the sword, and no law but their own will. 

 

Previous to the reign of Edward the Third, all public documents were  written in Norman-French ; but by the  statute of the 36° of that king it was  enacted that all law proceedings should  be conducted in the English tongue, but  be entered and enrolled in Latin, which  was observed until the protectorate of  Cromwell, when it was enacted that the  English language should alone be used  in the public records ; and the ancient  practice of using a corrupt Latin for  written pleadings was abolished, with  many other legal abuses. This innovation was not observed after the restoration of Charles the Second ; and when  the monarchy was restored, with much  of its inherent good and a considerable  portion of its trappings of evil, it was  held wise and reverential to restore the  old law language, and Latin continued  to be used down to the reign of George  the Second. In the year 1731, the magistrates of the North and East Ridings  of Yorkshire presented a petition to the  House of Commons, complaining " that  the obliging grand- jurymen at the sessions of the peace to make their pre-  sentiments in a language which few of  them understood, and the suffering, in  any of the proceedings of the courts of  justice, or in any of the transactions of  the law, whereby the person or property  of the subject may be affected, the use  of a language not intelligible and of a  character not legible but by the learned  in the law, were great occasion of the  delay of justice, and gave room to most  dangerous frauds." Lord Chancellor King, described as " one of the people" saw the necessity of attending to the  prayer of the Yorkshire petitions.

He directed a bill to be introduced to the House of Lords to enact "that all proceedings in courts of justice should be done into English;" the preamble setting forth "that the common people might have knowledge and understanding of  what was alleged or done for and against  them in the process and pleadings, the  judgment and entries in the cause."  The judges, speaking through the Lord Chief Justice, were decidedly against   the change " difficulties would arise in   translating the law out of Latin into English; law suits would be multiplied in regard to the interpretation of English words." The Duke of Argyle contended that our prayers were in our native tongue that they might be intelligible, and why should not the laws wherein our lives and properties are concerned. The complaint came from "the people," from magistrates and jurymen. There never was a period in our history, even in the darkest times, in which the remonstrances of the middle classes against prescriptive abuses were not faithfully seconded by some of an  aristocracy that did not stand, as a caste,  apart from "the people." The Bill passed after some opposition, such as is always at hand to resist what is dreaded as "innovation," and the lords added a clause  to provide that records and other documents should be written in a plain legible  hand, such as that in which Acts of Parliament are engrossed. The tenacity with which some minds, even of a high order, cling to custom and precedent, is shown in the lament of Blackstone that the old law Latin was disused. Lord Campbell adds — " I have heard the late Lord Ellenborough, from the Bench, regret the change, on the ground that it  has had the tendency to make attorneys illiterate."

8. Deed, whereby Sir Nicholas Devereux, of Belmagir, conveyed  to John  Rawcetor [Rosseter], of Rathmaoknee, Alexander Redmond of the Hooke, Richard Whittey and John Devereux, of Norriston, the Manor of Adameston, in the barony of Ballyfeoke, in the county of Wexford; To hold for ever, in trust for the use of the said Sir Nicholas for life, and after his decease to such uses as should be   expressed arid declared by his last will and testament. — Last of March, 1575.

 

38. Assignment from George, Earl of Shrewsbury, Wexford, and Waterford; Lord de Talbot, Furnivale, le Strange, and Wordon, to Robert Dauke, son of Henry Dauke, of a messuage and 1 20 acres of land, in Mowrontown, in the parish of Kildowan : To hold for ever, according to the antient custom and usage of the manor of Balma- karne : Witness, Thomas Rawcester, seneschal of the liberty of Wexford. — Wexford, September 20, 11° Henry VII being 1496. [Reign: 1485 -1509]

 

Rathmacknee Castle is believed to have been built by John Rosseter (Rossiter, Rositer, Rosceter) who was made seneschal of the Liberty of Wexford c. 1415. Other accounts associate its construction with his grandson Thomas Rossiter, seneschal in 1493. The Rossiters remained Catholic after the Reformation but stayed loyal to the monarchy and continued to hold their lands. Col. Thomas Rosseter [B: 1612 - ] fought against Oliver Cromwell at Wexford in the Irish Confederate Wars and the castle and lands were confiscated in 1654. The castle remained occupied until the 1760s. In the 19th century it was restored by its owner, Hamilton Knox Grogan Morgan

 

46.  Appointment of William Synnot, of Ballinran in " the Moroes," in the county of Wexford, to the office of Chief Justice of the liberties and privileges of the county of Wexford; To hold during good behaviour, in as ample manner as George Dormer held that office. — Castle of Dublin, Oct. 8, 36°-

 

67. Grant to Richard Chichester, in consideration of a fine of £20, of the custody, wardship, and marriage of John Rawceter, son and heir of Thomas Rawceter, late of Rathmakine, in the county of Wexford. — Bvhlin, Sept. 22 1594.

 

38. Licence to Sir Henry WaUopp to alienate and convey to   Lodovick Briskett, of Maighmaine, in the county of Wexford;   Oliver Wallpp, second son of Sir Henry, Richard Hopper, and   John Browne, the sit^, ambit, and precinct of the latp house of Priafs of Enniscorthy, in the county of Wexford; the manor of Enniscorthy, and all castles, messuages, mills, commons, ways, and tenements to the monastery belonging, and the towns and lands of   Enniscorthy, Garran, Kilkenan, Lougbwerrie, Barricroire, and Ballineparke, in the county of Wexford.— tZ^mJ/Jm, Apnl i, 4P°. 

 

26. Grant of the custody, wardship, and marriage of Marcus Novell, idiot, son and heir of Richard Novell, late of Ambrostowne, in the county of Wexford, to Walter Archer. — Dublin, May 30, 43°.

 

Lambert, Baldwin & Radulf de Rosei or de Rosey - Seal example

 

14.8 EXAMPLES OP MEDLEY AL SEALS.

Rosei or Rosey is mentioned as holding lands in Norfolk and elsewhere. This record furnishes no certain date, hut it was compiled from inquisitions taken tempp. Hen. HI. and Edw. I. A Radulf de Rosei appears in the Great Roll of the Pipe 4th Hen. II [1158], under Cambridgeshire, in connection with the Earl of Warenne. This was probably Radulf the father named in the deed. Two of the names appear as witnesses with William de Mandeville, Earl of Essex, to a confirmation by Galfrid de Say to Walden Abbey. (Mon. Ang.) These may have been the father and son, though one is called de Rosey and the other de Roseto; for in the deed itself their names also differ. A Radulf de Rosey witnessed a confirmatory grant by Matilda de Say, after the death of her husband William de Bocland, to the monks of Walden, of a church, which her grandmother Beatrix de Say had given them. (Mon. Aug.) Beatrix died in 1207; but when William de Bocland died has not been ascertained. He was Matilda's husband in 30 Hen. II [1174]. (See Mad. Form. Angl., p. 217.) Probably he died about the same time as Beatrix. However that may be, the grant by Matilda could hardly be earlier than 1207, and it is not improbable that was this Radulf de Rosei the son named in the deed; for the Earls of Warenne had lands both in Essex and Cambridgeshire, at no great distance from Walden. A Lambert de Rosei is mentioned as a benefactor to the monks in the first two grants by the second Earl of Warenne to Castle Acre Priory (Mon. Aug.) That Earl died in 1135, and therefore this could not be the Lamberd named in the above deed, though he may have been one of Baldwin's ancestors whose benefactions were confirmed by him. A Lamberd de Ros, probably for Rosei, appears as a witness to the grant by Drogo, son of William Dapifer de Gressinghall, to the same Priory (Mon. Ang.), but there is nothing to fix its date. The churches of Lechesham are mentioned in the Earl's grants above referred to, most likely East and West Lexham, Norfolk ; and a William de Lechesham is among the witnesses to a grant by Godfrid de Lisewis to the monks of Castle Acre at Rainham (Mon. Ang.), which is addressed to John Bp. of Norwich, and witnessed also by William Prior of Lewis, whereby the date is ascertained to be between 1175 and 1180. This William de Lechesham may possibly have been the witness to the above deed; but if so, he must have been advanced in years. A witness of the same name occurs to another grant by the same Godfrid, but there is nothing to indicate when it was made.  In determining the date of the document above given, the peculiar form of it is not to be disregarded. Such a deed might be referred to the twelfth century, and can hardly be much later than the commencement of the reign of Henry III.